Paul Haeder at Dissident Voice. The Down and Out Make More Sense than Any Billionaire
so why aren’t we listening, shaping policy around what the downtrodden know and see?
I like cat pictures and cute pictures of animal antics. But I really love seeing baby pictures online. Often times I find myself avoiding Facebook, but something I’m truly grateful for Facebook is seeing photos and updates about the children of my friends and family.
Today I was glancing at some of the blogs whose authors follow this blog. One that had a lot of content interesting to me. I’d seen it before too, but I didn’t click follow—and I’m a promiscuous follower—because there were also pictures of the author’s children on the blog.
When I see baby pictures I can feel my face change as if I’m actually seeing a child in person. I think there’s something quite deeply set in people in our reactions to young children. Of course there are millions of things we have to learn, but in most of us there’s something of a built in program to interact with a young child. And that program is deeply connected with what any of us know about love.
It’s fundamental to being an adult to be there to protect children. And there are simply too many ways that as people in society we fail to.
At Tom Dispatch there’s an excerpt from Astra Taylor’s new book: The People’s Platform: Taking Back Power and Culture in the Digital Age.
Taylor makes so many important points, and the depressingly obvious one is just how much misogyny there is online. I see it in my feed, women simply get—on average—more anonymous hate.
The posts that show up in my feed, even ones I’m not particularly interested in, are gifts. Some bloggers are simply so good it seems impossible not to feel gratitude. And then I see those very bloggers getting anonymous hate. It’s incredible, but hard to miss the predominance of that hatred is directed at women.
Raising children is very important for all of us, whether or not we have children of our own. I like it when men talk about their experiences in this endeavor and I like it when women do too. It really matters.
I felt a real tension trying to decide whether to follow a blog with baby pictures. I felt following might seem a bit creepy. Like I said, I really do believe that it’s one of my primary duties as a grown-up to make sure kids are safe. And, creepy guys are contrary to safe. On the other hand women who are primary care givers to young children don’t suddenly stop being interested in the myriad other topics and issues of living in the world today. Besides, raising children is a hell of an important topic on its own.
I don’t know how I can make online spaces safer, more fair, and inclusive for women. Surely not being a jerk is a good place to start. Still, I’m convinced that the ubiquitous misogyny online is a critical issue for everyone. Taylor’s “taking back power” means empowering women’s voices.
I just can’t shake how revealing trying to decide whether to follow back a person following this blog was: Of course the Internet isn’t safe for women. But that’s something we all should work to change.
— Dave Winer at Scripting News. Knock knock
It is a “post-transgressive” novel because it seems relatively uninterested in whether or not its bourgeois readers and critics will “conquer” their disgust. And, also, I think, because it is so invested in “fun” and “affection.” Whereas the “transgressive” novel is invested in a big “fuck you” to the world, Through the Valley of the Nest of Spiders is interested in what a livable world might be, especially a world in which a Shit can thrive. (And, here, it’s striking how much easier it seems for reviewers to focus on Eric to the exclusion of Shit.)
This is a post-transgressive novel precisely because it imagines a world where Shit can thrive."
keguro at Gukira. “Benign Perversion”
I haven’t read any of Samuel Delaney's books. It's not very likely that I'll read Through the Valley of the Nest of Spiders. But this review is one of the reasons I love the Internet so much. I read keguro’s earlier piece about the book after I read this and he linked to two further reviews by Lavelle Porter and Steven Shaviro and I read those too. Pre-Internet, perhaps I would have found a review of the book somewhere. What’s so different is to be able to instantly get other takes too.
Yesterday I posted a link to Clare Stestanovich's piece in The Atlantic about the online conversation between Ta-Nehisi Coates and Jonathan Chait. I came to this conversation by way of Ta-Nehisi Coates, but it's quite clear plenty of other readers had it the other way around, or found themselves in the midst of the conversation by way of Andrew Sullivan or others.
I know, I know, it’s a boring old-man’s point, but this sort of writing was much less possible pre-Internet. It’s still astonishing to me that writing like this exists.
— Dan Kaminsky on his blog. Be Still My Breaking Heart
— Adam Rothstein at The State. how not to be white on the internet
There’s been no shortage of dissection and parsing of Edward Snowden’s interview with the Washington Post’s Barton Gellman. One detail that hasn’t received very much attention, though, is Snowden’s…
Ryan Gallagher an Peter Maass at The Intercept. Inside the NSA’s Secret Efforts to Hunt and Hack System Administrators
Youtube link Julian Assange: Sysadmins of the world, unite!
Sean Gallagher at ArsTechnica. NSA’s automated hacking engine offers hands-free pwning of the world
With Turbine, no humans are required to exploit phones, PCs, routers, VPNs.
- “…despite what conservatives may think, there is no “magical” force that creates shared prosperity and wealth in capitalist societies. Piketty goes on...”
- “This being human is a guest house.
Every morning, a new arrival.
Welcome and entertain them all.
Meet them at the door laughing and let them...”
- Okay, but it's not just about getting paid to prance around in a princess costume
Let me tell you a story. Once at a party, I had all...